Fingerprint scanning is often deceived; for entry into a non-sensitive cabinet may it be acceptable?

• A. A notebook containing sensitive information
• B. A non-sensitive supplies cabinet
• C. Both A and B
• D. Neither A nor B

Answer: (B)

This question tests risk-based decision making for access controls using biometrics. Fingerprint scanners are convenient, but they aren’t foolproof; fingerprints can be spoofed or replicated, and some sensors can be tricked by fake prints or latent residues. Because of that, using a fingerprint alone for high-value or sensitive items isn’t ideal.

For a non-sensitive supplies cabinet, the impact of an unauthorized entry is relatively low, so a fingerprint-only control can be acceptable if you’re prioritizing ease of access and cost over perfect security. It provides a reasonable barrier without the extra expense or complexity of stronger methods. In contrast, a notebook with sensitive information represents a higher risk, so you’d want stronger protection—such as multi-factor authentication, a physical lock combined with encryption, or other safeguards beyond a single biometric factor.

So, the best-fit scenario is using fingerprint access for the non-sensitive cabinet, while recognizing that a more robust approach would be required for sensitive items.